Plaintiff Ordered to Undergo Rule 35 Examination to Determine Whether Workplace Injuries Are 'Exaggerated, Amplified, or Owed to Malingering'

A federal judge sided with a Maryland contractor in its request to order a plaintiff to undergo a neuropsychological examination to assess whether her subjective complaints are exaggerated or caused by an underlying psychological condition following a workplace accident.

       
News
Author: News

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *