Analyze all or a portion of Inaja Land Company, Ltd. v. Commissioner, using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology in your comments below. Remember to “Blue Book” where appropriate.
Analyze all or a portion of Inaja Land Company, Ltd. v. Commissioner, using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology in your comments below. Remember to “Blue Book” where appropriate.
Facts: City paid taxpayer $50M for an easement to divert water onto taxpayer’s property. It could not be determined how much of the taxpayer’s land would be flooded and what damages would result.
Issue: Is the $50M taxable income?
Rule: Internal Revenue Code Section 22 (a)
Application: It’s impossible to allocate basis to the part of the property covered by the easement.
Conclusion: The money received is not income, but reduces the landowner’s basis in the property by that amount.