Attorney's 'Groundless, Provocative, and Legally Meritless' Against Judge's Integrity Leads Indefinite Suspension

Written by

in

“What Marshall did not have the right to do was make serious, disparaging allegations impugning Judge Wechsler’s integrity as a judicial officer without a factual basis,” stated the opinion. “It was the groundless, provocative, and legally meritless quality of his allegations, not his filing of a motion to recuse, that we sanctioned.”

       
News
Author: News

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *