Analyze  all or a portion of Begier v. IRS, using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology in your comments below.  Remember to “Blue Book” where appropriate.
Category: IRAC Case
For each case, analyze it using the IRAC methodology – Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion. Add your analysis to the comment section and receive points when your comment is approved.
Invacare Corp. v. Healthdyne Technologies, Inc., 968 F. Supp. 1578 – Dist. Court, ND Georgia 1997
Analyze all or a portion ofInvacare Corp. v. Healthdyne Technologies. Inc.using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology in your comments below. Remember to “Blue Book” where appropriate.
Gimbel v. Signal Companies, Inc., 316 A. 2d 619 – Del: Supreme Court 1974
Analyze all or a portion ofGimbel v. Signal Companies, Inc.using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology in your comments below. Remember to “Blue Book” where appropriate.
Hollinger Intern., Inc. v. Black, 844 A. 2d 1022 – Del: Court of Chancery 2004
Analyze all or a portion ofHollinger International, Inc. v. Blackusing the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology in your comments below. Remember to “Blue Book” where appropriate.
AMP Inc. v. Allied Signal lnc.
Analyze all or a portion ofAMP Inc. v. Allied Signal lnc.using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology in your comments below. Remember to “Blue Book” where appropriate.
Jordan Marsh Company v. CIR, 269 F. 2d 453 – Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit 1959
Analyze  all or a portion of Jordan Marsh Company v. CIR, using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology in your comments below.  Remember to “Blue Book” where appropriate.