Analyze all or a portion of SEC v. Lund, using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology in your comments below. Remember to “Blue Book” where appropriate.
Category: IRAC Case
For each case, analyze it using the IRAC methodology – Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion. Add your analysis to the comment section and receive points when your comment is approved.
-
SEC v. Lund, 570 F. Supp. 1397 – Dist. Court, CD California 1983
-
Morris v. Business Concepts, Inc.
Analyze all or a portion of Morris v. Business Concepts, Inc., 259 F. 3d 65 – Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit 2001, using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology in your comments below. Remember to “Blue Book” where appropriate. -
Geisel v. Poynter Products, Inc.
Analyze all or a portion of Geisel v. Poynter Products, Inc., 295 F. Supp. 331 – Dist. Court, SD New York 1968, using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology in your comments below. Remember to “Blue Book” where appropriate. -
Mirage Editions, Inc. v. Albuquerque ART Co.
Analyze all or a portion of Mirage Editions, Inc. v. Albuquerque ART Co., 856 F. 2d 1341 – Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit 1988, using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology in your comments below. Remember to “Blue Book” where appropriate. -
Commissioner v. Sunnen, 333 US 591 – Supreme Court 1948
Analyze all or a portion of Commissioner v. Sunnen, using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology in your comments below. Remember to “Blue Book” where appropriate. -
Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.
Analyze all or a portion of Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co., 499 US 340 – Supreme Court 1991, using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology in your comments below. Remember to “Blue Book” where appropriate.