Category: IRAC Case
For each case, analyze it using the IRAC methodology – Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion. Add your analysis to the comment section and receive points when your comment is approved.
-
MTA v. Bruken Realty Corp.
Analyze all or a portion of MTA v. Bruken Realty Corp., 67 NY 2d 156 – NY: Court of Appeals 1986, using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology in your comments below. Remember to “Blue Book” where appropriate. -
Lucas v. Hamm
Analyze all or a portion of Lucas v. Hamm, 56 Cal. 2d 583 – Cal: Supreme Court 1961, using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology in your comments below. Remember to “Blue Book” where appropriate. -
Orange and Rockland Util v. Hess, 59 AD 2d 110, NY: Appellate Div., 2nd Dept. 1977
Analyze all or a portion of Orange and Rockland Util v. Hess, using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology in your comments below. Remember to “Blue Book” where appropriate. -
United States v. Winstar Corp.
Analyze all or a portion of United States v. Winstar Corp., 518 US 839 – Supreme Court 1996, using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology in your comments below. Remember to “Blue Book” where appropriate. -
Red Cross Line v. Atlantic Fruit Co.
Analyze all or a portion of Red Cross Line v. Atlantic Fruit Co., 264 US 109 – Supreme Court 1924, using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology in your comments below. Remember to “Blue Book” where appropriate.
Analyze all or a portion of