Category: IRAC Case
For each case, analyze it using the IRAC methodology – Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion. Add your analysis to the comment section and receive points when your comment is approved.
-
General Util. & Operating Co. v. Helvering, 296 US 200 – Supreme Court 1935
Analyze all or a portion of General Util. & Operating Co. v. Helvering, using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology in your comments below. Remember to “Blue Book” where appropriate. -
Pudenz v. Littlefuse, Inc.
Analyze all or a portion of Pudenz v. Littlefuse, Inc., 177 F. 3d 1204 – Court of Appeals, 11th Circuit 1999, using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology in your comments below. Remember to “Blue Book” where appropriate. -
Georgia Pac. Consumer Products, LP v. Von Drehle Corp.
Analyze all or a portion of Georgia Pac. Consumer Products, LP v. Von Drehle Corp., 618 F. 3d 441 – Court of Appeals, 4th Circuit 2010, using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology in your comments below. Remember to “Blue Book” where appropriate. -
De Beers LV Trademark Ltd. v. DeBeers Diamond Syndicate Inc., 440 F. Supp. 2d 249 – Dist. Court, SD New York 2006
Analyze all or a portion of De Beers LV Trademark Ltd. v. DeBeers Diamond Syndicate Inc., 440 F. Supp. 2d 249 – Dist. Court, SD New York 2006, using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology in your comments below. Remember to “Blue Book” where appropriate. -
Conservative Caucus v. Chevron Corp
Analyze all or a portion of Conservative Caucus v. Chevron Corp., using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology in your comments below. Remember to “Blue Book” where appropriate.