Category: IRAC Case
For each case, analyze it using the IRAC methodology – Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion. Add your analysis to the comment section and receive points when your comment is approved.
-
Money Store v. Harriscorp Finance, Inc., 689 F. 2d 666 – Court of Appeals, 7th Circuit 1982
Analyze all or a portion of Money Store v. Harriscorp Finance, Inc., using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology in your comments below. Remember to “Blue Book” where appropriate. -
Seabrook v. Commuter Hous. Co., 72 Misc. 2d 6 – NY: City Court, Civil Court 1972
Analyze all or a portion of Seabrook v. Commuter Hous. Co., using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology in your comments below. Remember to “Blue Book” where appropriate. -
Lang v. Retirement Living Pub. Co., Inc., 949 F. 2d 576 – Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit 1991
Analyze all or a portion of Lang v. Retirement Living Pub. Co., Inc., using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology in your comments below. Remember to “Blue Book” where appropriate.
-
Fisons Horticulture, Inc. v. Vigoro Industries, Inc., 30 F. 3d 466 – Court of Appeals, 3rd Circuit 1994
Analyze all or a portion of Fisons Horticulture, Inc. v. Vigoro Industries, Inc., using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology in your comments below. Remember to “Blue Book” where appropriate. -
Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Company, 350 F. 2d 445 – Court of Appeals, Dist. of Columbia Circuit 1965
Analyze all or a portion of Williams v. Walker-Thomas Furniture Company, using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology in your comments below. Remember to “Blue Book” where appropriate.
Analyze all or a portion of