News

Do the political activities of Justice Clarence Thomas’s wife cross a line?

An obscure New York City gun case could tempt the justices to make broad pronouncements about a right they haven’t addressed in a decade.

It promised to create a ‘robust’ waiver process for visa applicants from countries affected by the travel ban. The process is a sham.

At the meeting, which was unusual for the wife of a Supreme Court justice and a president, the activists denounced women serving in the military…

There was no need for the Supreme Court to reinstate a misguided ban on transgender service members.

The justices chose not to protect the rights of transgender patriots like me.

Forty-six years after Roe, the two camps increasingly disagree on basic facts about abortion — and who has the authority to determine them.

The court’s action almost certainly means it will not hear the administration’s challenge in its current term, which ends in June.

The case concerns an ordinance in New York that prohibits people licensed to have guns in their homes to transport their guns outside the city.

By a 5 to 4 vote, justices temporarily stayed trial court decisions blocking the policy while litigation in the lower courts moves forward.