-
IRAC
Posts
McConkey v. McConkey
Analyze all or a portion of McConkey v. McConkey, 215 SE 2d 640 – Va: Supreme Court 1975, using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology in your…
Southwest Engineering Co., Inc. v. Martin Tractor Co., 473 P. 2d 18 – Kan: Supreme Court 1970
Analyze all or a portion of Southwest Engineering Co., Inc. v. Martin Tractor Co., using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology in your comments below. Remember to…
Brown v. Thomas
Analyze all or a portion of Brown v. Thomas, 379 NW 2d 868 – Wis: Court of Appeals 1985, using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology in…
Britt v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Analyze all or a portion of Britt v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 202 Va. 906 – Va: Supreme Court 1961, using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology in…
Tuck v. Tuck
Analyze all or a portion of Tuck v. Tuck, 14 NY 2d 341 – NY: Court of Appeals 1964, using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology in…
Ankenbrandt v. Richards
Analyze all or a portion of Ankenbrandt v. Richards, 504 US 689 – Supreme Court 1992, using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology in your comments below….
Anastasi v. Anastasi
Analyze all or a portion of Anastasi v. Anastasi, 544 F. Supp. 866 – Dist. Court, D. New Jersey 1982, using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology…
Marvin v. Marvin
Analyze all or a portion of Marvin v. Marvin, 557 P. 2d 106 – Cal: Supreme Court 1976, using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology in your…
Stanard v. Bolin
Analyze all or a portion of Stanard v. Bolin, 565 P. 2d 94 – Wash: Supreme Court 1977, using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology in your…
Watts v. Watts
Analyze all or a portion of Watts v. Watts, 405 NW 2d 305 – Wis: Supreme Court 1987, using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology in your…