-
IRAC
Posts
Gregory v. Helvering
Analyze all or a portion of Gregory v. Helvering, 293 US 465 – Supreme Court 1935, using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology in your comments below….
Gibbons v. Ogden
Analyze all or a portion of Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 US 1 – Supreme Court 1824, using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology in your comments below….
Spinelli v. United States, 393 US 410 – Supreme Court 1969
Analyze all or a portion of Spinelli v. United States, using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology in your comments below. Remember to “Blue Book” where appropriate.
Commissioner v. Culbertson
Analyze all or a portion of Commissioner v. Culbertson, 337 US 733 – Supreme Court 1949, using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology in your comments below….
Kraus v. CIR
Analyze all or a portion of Kraus v. CIR, 490 F. 2d 898 – Court of Appeals, 2nd Circuit 1974, using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology…
Crane v. Commissioner
Analyze all or a portion of Crane v. Commissioner, 331 US 1 – Supreme Court 1947, using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology in your comments below….
AP Green Export Company v. United States
Analyze all or a portion of AP Green Export Company v. United States, 284 F. 2d 383 – Court of Claims 1960, using the Issue, Rule, Application, and…
Cook v. Tait
Analyze all or a portion of Cook v. Tait, 265 US 47 – Supreme Court 1924, using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology in your comments below….
Tobey v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Analyze all or a portion of Tobey v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 60 TC 227 – Tax Court 1973, using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology in…
Croyle v. Commissioner
Analyze all or a portion of Croyle v. Commissioner, 41 TCM (CCH) 339 – Tax Court 1980, using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology in your comments…
