-
IRAC
Posts
Crowell v. Benson, 285 US 22 – Supreme Court 1932
Analyze all or a portion of Crowell v. Benson, using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology in your comments below. Remember to “Blue Book” where appropriate.
In re Marriage of Cargill and Rollins
Analyze all or a portion of In re Marriage of Cargill and Rollins, 843 P. 2d 1335 – Colo: Supreme Court 1993, using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion…
McConkey v. McConkey
Analyze all or a portion of McConkey v. McConkey, 215 SE 2d 640 – Va: Supreme Court 1975, using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology in your…
Southwest Engineering Co., Inc. v. Martin Tractor Co., 473 P. 2d 18 – Kan: Supreme Court 1970
Analyze all or a portion of Southwest Engineering Co., Inc. v. Martin Tractor Co., using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology in your comments below. Remember to…
Brown v. Thomas
Analyze all or a portion of Brown v. Thomas, 379 NW 2d 868 – Wis: Court of Appeals 1985, using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology in…
Britt v. Commonwealth of Virginia
Analyze all or a portion of Britt v. Commonwealth of Virginia, 202 Va. 906 – Va: Supreme Court 1961, using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology in…
Tuck v. Tuck
Analyze all or a portion of Tuck v. Tuck, 14 NY 2d 341 – NY: Court of Appeals 1964, using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology in…
Ankenbrandt v. Richards
Analyze all or a portion of Ankenbrandt v. Richards, 504 US 689 – Supreme Court 1992, using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology in your comments below….
Anastasi v. Anastasi
Analyze all or a portion of Anastasi v. Anastasi, 544 F. Supp. 866 – Dist. Court, D. New Jersey 1982, using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology…
Marvin v. Marvin
Analyze all or a portion of Marvin v. Marvin, 557 P. 2d 106 – Cal: Supreme Court 1976, using the Issue, Rule, Application, and Conclusion methodology in your…