“In this case, Roeslein has not submitted evidence proving that Wendt contracted a specific or specialized portion of its contract to Trillium, and there remains a genuine dispute of material fact as to whether Trillium was a subcontractor of Wendt,” the court said. “As a result, summary judgment cannot be granted as to Roeslein’s claim that Wendt breached the contract by failing to require Trillium to be bound by the agreements.”
Leave a Reply